Test results · 2026-10-23

Proof: what we tested, and what failed

For each paid pack: the exact test input, the raw output, the date and model, and everything that failed or that we didn't test. Across the five packs we ran 13 real tests today: 8 passed, 3 partly, 2 failed. We left the failures in.

The proof pages

ProductPriceResult
App Builder Agent Pack$193 runs: 2 passed, 1 partly, 0 failed.
Research Agent Pack$92 runs: 1 passed, 0 partly, 1 failed.
Customer Support Agent Pack$93 runs: 1 passed, 1 partly, 1 failed.
YouTube & TikTok Script Agent Pack$92 runs: 1 passed, 1 partly, 0 failed.
Discord Community Manager Packfrom $3 (pay what you want)3 runs: 3 passed, 0 partly, 0 failed.
All 5 Premium Packs Bundle$29Byte-for-byte contents check (no model run)

Method

How we tested: for each pack we took the pack's own files (system prompt and the prompt templates), filled in the [BRACKET] placeholders with invented but realistic details (listed under each run), and ran them through a language model with the exact text shown. We saved the raw output and wrote down what held and what didn't. These are single runs on one model. Output varies between runs and between models, and your inputs will differ from ours. Treat this as evidence of what the files can do, not as a guarantee.

Model and settings: grok-4.3 (xAI API), temperature 0, one call per run, on 2026-10-23 (America/Louisville time zone).

Rules we hold ourselves to

Same idea, free

Our free Next.js + Supabase + Stripe rules page and the full $9 kit follow this standard too. The kit ships its own VERIFY-LOG.txt with raw output: Next.js + Supabase + Stripe agent rules.